Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: FormerLib

“When you say that something looks like a violation when you already know that it isn’t, what would you call that?”

I never said that I know that it isn’t a violation, I said that I know that Catholics and Orthodox don’t believe it is one. I’ve been pretty clear that I don’t agree with that opinion.

Still, how does that mean I am judging their faith? If I thought they were wilfully violating the commandment, meaning that they knew what they were doing was a violation, and they decided to keep doing it anyway, then maybe you would have a point. Instead, I’m simply trying to argue that what Catholics and Orthodox believe is appropriate is clearly in contradiction to the clear statements of Scripture on the matter. That isn’t judging their faith, it’s simply trying to point out where I believe they are in error in their doctrine.


157 posted on 03/06/2012 6:53:56 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies ]


To: Boogieman

If it is such a clear statement, wouldn’t that mean that all “graven images” are a sin, including any photos you might own of family or other loved ones?


166 posted on 03/10/2012 12:12:02 PM PST by FormerLib (Sacrificing our land and our blood cannot buy protection from jihad.-Bishop Artemije of Kosovo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson