Darwinism defines the “unfit”. Whatever doesn’t survive was unfit.
I understood “Darwinism” to not exist (according to all the best representatives of Science). Do you, perchance, have in mind the Darwinian Theory of Evolution and its logical corollary, the theory of the survival of the fittest)?
But, using your expression “Darwinism” for the moment, permit me to observe that “Darwinism” possesses no personality and lacks the ability to define anything. It is those who use the term who define the “unfit.” Defining “the unfit” is a favorite pastime of Darwinian mullahs and imans, so does your horizon expand to include religious and political Darwinism, in which case we would have to declare the Aztecs and the ancient Egyptians “unfit,” or does it have no connotations other than scientific, and can therefore lead us to no religious or political conclusions?