If you bothered to read the article you would see that it isn't about creationism, it is about Darwinists and their devotion to the culture of death.
Or are you trying to say that the culture of death IS a religion?
Blaming all scientific inquiry for the abuses and inaccuracies of some is kind of like those who blame Christians in the 21st century for the inquisition.
Except for the FACT that Darwinian eugenics has been used to murder over a billion innocent people.
Or perhaps you would burn me at the stake while assuring me I’m damned to hell?
When you or any of the other Darwinists can find a single post where a FReeper has EVER supported burning someone at the stake I will happily join all of the anti-FReepers at DC.
Well I suggest you get me zapped from FR. I don’t know of anything called Darwinism or evolutionism, they sound like religions to me. In point of fact, I am opposed to abortion as I know from science that a unique human being is created at the moment of conception. Those DNA merchants of death came up with that.
The misuse of a science can not discredit science as the misuse is anti-science. Science doesn’t prove, disprove or invent values. I get my values from Christianity and truthfulness is one of them. Value of human life and all life for that matter is another.
The idea that being evolve to a normatively better condition is nonsense from the latter part of the 19th and early part of the twentieth century. If an organism survives, it reproduces. That’s all. What use that is put to by men is up to men and the value of that use can not be proven. Science may be used in a cult of death but it does not produce the cult.
A pound of c4 may be used in building a highway or attached to a terrorist’s belt. The explosion it produces is the same and a scientist built the explosive but did not dictate how it was used. The same analogy works for the theory of evolution. By the same token, the theory is not now identical to the 19th century theory, it has evolved if you will.