Perhaps because religious Christians and Jews don't denounce Genesis as "ignorant."
You may be confused because every time you make your idiotic ‘acceptance of evolution = atheism’ argument I point out that the Pope accepts evolution.
Just about everyone accepts certain aspects of the theory of evolution.
Are horses and zebras related? Almost certainly.
Do animals have natural defenses to adapt to certain climates? Of course they do.
Did mankind "evolve" from a sea-dwelling amoeba? ABSOLUTELY NOT.
Ah yes, the inherent contradiction at the heart of the Creationist delusion.
They accept evolution when they need to explain how we got all modern terrestrial species from those few that could fit on a boat - at a speed and with a power far beyond that proposed by evolutionary biology.
Yet they claim to not accept evolution - despite when they need it, accepting it at many hundreds of times the observed rate.
You find nothing objectionable about Zebras and Horses being related, but find it an impossibility that humans and chimps could be related by common descent?
Are you aware that the genetic difference between a Horse and a Zebra is much greater than the genetic difference between a human and a chimpanzee?
How is it that such a large change is perfectly reasonable over a very short time period - but much less of a genetic change is absolutely impossible even after six or seven million years?
Can you explain to me how you explain that to yourself?
That should be amusing!