Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Venturer
This isn’t law, this is a ruling from a bureaucrat.

Which, as I understand it, is what we discovered to be in the bill. i.e. three bureaus of the executive branch (Labor, Treasury and HHS) are given the power to implement the law as they see fit.

Remember Bart Stupak? He raised the objection over what he saw as the very possibility of what Obama rolled out. He was a"assured" that would not happen. He voted "ate".

btw, has anyone heard from Bart?

11 posted on 02/11/2012 3:55:00 AM PST by don-o (He will not share His glory and He will NOT be mocked! Blessed be the name of the Lord forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: don-o
Stupak was "assured" by my congressman, (Rep Mike Doyle, D, PA-14). He sealed the deal and convinced Stupak to vote "aye."

My Bishop, Zubik, started much of the opposition to Obama's dictum with a letter to the Diocese of Pittsburgh.

I have suggested that the Bishop issue an excommunication edict against Doyle for his actions.

But the Bishop has chickened out.

14 posted on 02/11/2012 4:23:50 AM PST by FroggyTheGremlim (Excommunicate evildoers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson