Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Dr. Brian Kopp

Are you a Quiverfull advocate?


23 posted on 02/09/2012 11:24:59 PM PST by DNA.2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DNA.2012

No, I’m Catholic. Quiverfull is primarily a protestant movement.


25 posted on 02/09/2012 11:30:14 PM PST by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: DNA.2012
I'm a big fan of Providentialism in general, but I also realize that 1) Christians need a bridge out of the contraceptive mentality and into Providentialism, and 2) there are morally licit reasons to have recourse to infertile periods in a woman's cycle, and this is consistent with scripture, so I don't have a problem with Natural Family Planning (my wife and I taught it for 10 years.) Quiverfull rejects NFP:

Quiverfull is a movement among some conservative evangelical Christian couples chiefly in the United States, but with some adherents in Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Britain and elsewhere. It promotes procreation, and sees children as a blessing from God, eschewing all forms of birth control, including natural family planning and sterilization. Adherents are known as "quiver full", "full quiver", "quiverfull-minded", or simply "QF" Christians. Some refer to the Quiverfull position as Providentialism, while other sources have referred to it as a manifestation of natalism. Currently several thousand Christians worldwide identify with this movement. It began to receive significant attention in the U.S. national press in 2004.

27 posted on 02/09/2012 11:42:00 PM PST by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: DNA.2012; anglian

The Church (which, anglian, does include a few married people, including myself, as well) differs from Quiverfull in Humanae Vitae (Paul VI’s encyclical on the subject) in at least two ways:

(1) if one prayerfully discerns that God has put serious reasons in one’s life for avoiding pregnancy, periodic abstinence is an option.

(2) natural spacing arranged by God is to be honoured. (cf. Humanae Vitae sections 10 and 11) The natural spacing would include a traditional breast feeding pattern which normally keeps kids 18 to 36 months apart. I don’t think it a coincidence that formula began being marketed in the 20’s and began to be marketed agressively in the 50’s, with each push being followed a few years later by great pushes on the contraceptive front. Most people aren’t called to have kids every 11 months, but most people aren’t called to bottle feed either (the Church does have some things to say about this subject to, though it is not in the same category of seriousness as contraception). When one bottle feeds, one is telling the body that either (1) baby miscarried or died or (2) baby is in the process of weaning so we can now have another baby. God is one smart dude, even if He isn’t married (at least in the conventional sense).


30 posted on 02/10/2012 12:06:02 AM PST by Hieronymus ( (It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged. --G.K. Chesterton))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson