Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: stfassisi; boatbums

So are you saying that the popes that were mentioned did NOT reverse previous popes positions? That Sixtus V, in his Bull of 1588 did NOT disagree with the previous pope? Then why the need to proclaim the previous pope’s position? And Sixtus V’s successor, Gregory XIV did NOT reverse the new decree of Sixtus V? And on and on? What about the 1621 Vatican issued pastoral directive permitting abortion up to 40 days? Are you saying that this is NOT real church history that CAN be proven to have happened? No matter how much you abhore the messenger as a “liar”, the message CAN be researched for accuracy. If one cares to find the truth of popes and their reversals on each other’s doctrines. And if these plainly stated facts are either true or they are a lie. And the author should be sued for slander. But if they are not lies, then the Catholic Church should own up to the truth. Shooting the messenger does NOT make the message a lie.


344 posted on 02/08/2012 5:27:51 PM PST by smvoice (Better Buck up, Buttercup. The wailing and gnashing are for an eternity..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies ]


To: smvoice

The Church all along was against abortion from conception ,anything that anyone said afterwards means nothing since dogma can never change. There is no authentic record of what Dave Hunt is even saying that states the Church changed its position . Hunt is a liar.


358 posted on 02/08/2012 6:07:10 PM PST by stfassisi ((The greatest gift God gives us is that of overcoming self"-St Francis Assisi)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 344 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson