I think you are forgetting which one of us is doing the rhetorical rope-a-dope.
My argument stands on its own.
And honestly, you really have no room to criticize "poorly worded" statements....
This much is true!
Let me clarify this early morning "double exposure:"
The Scriptures require believers to make moral reprove error, (Eph. 4:11) but it is the bases for it that is the issue.
Corrected and rephrased, the Scriptures require believers to make moral judgments and reprove error, (Eph. 4:11) but it is the basis for such that remains the issue.
It is also understood that Rome does not claim to define doctrine irregardless regardless of evidence, but that her claim to infallibility precludes that evidence could prove her wrong, and that assurance of the infallibility of her decrees does not rest upon the weight of scriptural warrant.