Vanderbilt to religious students: Are your beliefs really that important?

Daily Caller ^ | 02/01/2012 | By Robert Shibley

[SeekAndFind]

On January 20, Vanderbilt University announced that it will prohibit religious and political student groups from making leadership decisions based on their religious or political beliefs. University policy now holds that “membership in registered student organizations is open to everyone and that everyone, if desired, has the opportunity to seek leadership positions.”

Vanderbilt’s decision follows months of controversy. Last fall, the Christian Legal Society chapter at Vanderbilt Law School was warned that it could lose recognition after the university found that the group’s constitution violated the university’s non-discrimination policy. The constitution required that all group officers must agree with the Christian Legal Society’s statement of faith and would be expected to lead Bible studies and prayer groups. Vanderbilt objected, stating that the Christian Legal Society’s constitution “would seem to indicate that officers are expected to hold certain beliefs.”

Tonight, the university is holding a “town hall” meeting to discuss Vanderbilt’s decision. At this event, students will likely wish to hear answers to questions such as these about the ramifications of the university’s policy:

• If one of the leaders of Vanderbilt’s Muslim Students Association were to convert to Christianity, is the group required to maintain that person in his or her leadership role despite the fact that he or she is no longer Muslim?

• Vanderbilt informed the Christian Legal Society that its requirement that student leaders “lead Bible studies, prayer, and worship” was against the policy because it implied that these leaders must hold certain religious beliefs. How do you suggest religious groups at Vanderbilt fulfill their purposes without leaders who can accomplish such core tasks of religious leadership?

• While this dispute was originally confined to religious organizations, your statement of January 20 states that all student organizations must accept any student as a member or a leader. If a group of straight students — the majority at Vanderbilt — were to join the Vanderbilt Lambda Association, vote themselves into office, and disband the group or alter the group’s mission, what recourse would LGBT members of the Lambda Association have?

• If a member of the College Republicans joins the College Democrats in order to discover their plans for political activism and report those plans back to the College Republicans so as to thwart them, do the College Democrats have any way to stop him or her?

• Under this policy, must an ideological student journal like Vanderbilt’s Orbis accept editors or publish columnists who disagree with, mock, or denigrate its progressive political views?

• Many groups in the Occupy movement choose to make decisions by consensus. How could a Vanderbilt-based Occupy group operate if a small group of students joined specifically to prevent the group from acting in any way by always preventing a consensus from forming?

• If a student were to join an environmentalist group like Vanderbilt SPEAR and then used his membership in that group to increase his or her credibility when publicly criticizing the group’s positions in the Nashville or Vanderbilt newspapers, what could the group do to prevent this?

The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, where I work, wrote Vanderbilt of these concerns last September, but received no response. FIRE was not alone in its concern: Twenty-three members of the United States Congress, the national Christian Legal Society, Vanderbilt law professor Carol Swain, Roman Catholic Bishop David Choby of Nashville, and many others warned Vanderbilt that a decision to deny religious or political groups the right to require that their leaders believe in the group’s mission would severely impair the rights of Vanderbilt students.

Indeed, Vanderbilt promises that students “are entitled to exercise the rights of citizens,” yet the university’s decision now forbids them from doing so. Vanderbilt students now have fewer rights than their counterparts at the University of Tennessee — or their friends from high school who chose not to attend college at all.

I hope that Vanderbilt is prepared to answer the above questions in a way that will not alarm or dismay Vanderbilt’s students or the general public.

Robert Shibley is the senior vice president of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE).

[narses]

+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.

[mo]

Sounds like a threat to me...

[zot]

Thanks for the culture war ping. I hope Vanderbilt is forced to retract this policy.

[Goreknowshowtocheat]

I hope alums will retract their giving. I had to stop sending money to Purdue when they had Bill Ayers on campus for a talk.

[dsc]

“many college ‘religion’ professors are anti-Christian bigots these days.”

Well, you and I let them go to work every day unhindered, so I don’t guess we have any room to complain.

[zot]

Yes, if enough of their alums stop giving and tell them why, that might motivate Vanderbilt to retract this policy.

[RobbyS]

What troubles me is Vanderbilt’s implication that religious beliefs are, like political ones, simply matters of opinion. That there is no truth in religion. That whether Jesus is the Son of God is a question on the same level as the constitutionality of social security.

[toothfairy86]

Until recently, Vanderbilt nursing students were required to participate in abortion procedures, or risk flunking out. The anti-abortion students sued and won...but only because Vanderbilt takes government money, which forbids them to discriminate against someone’s religious beliefs.

[johngrace]

First they came for the communists,

and I didn’t speak out because I wasn’t a communist.

Then they came for the trade unionists,

and I didn’t speak out because I wasn’t a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Jews,

and I didn’t speak out because I wasn’t a Jew.

Then they came for the Catholics,

and I didn’t speak out because I was Protestant.

Then they came for me

and there was no one left to speak out for me.

First they came…” is a famous statement attributed to pastor Martin Niemöller (1892–1984) about the inactivity of German intellectuals following the Nazi rise to power and the purging of their chosen targets, group after group. The text of the quotation is usually presented roughly as follows:

[CommerceComet]

but only because Vanderbilt takes government money, which forbids them to discriminate against someone’s religious beliefs.

Obama will fix this when he gets a chance. Acceptance of abortion must trump all rights in his mind.