Replies

It will happen, do you really think that a reaction from devout Christians knowledgeable of Mormonism will meet with what, ‘agreement in the public world and on talk radio’, or with the host challenging their view and falling into searching for common ground with Mormons.

The only way for a Christian to address Mormonism is in the biblical, fundamentalist type language that is not allowed in public.
Are Mormons Christians? Are Satan and Christ brothers? etc. public figures cannot, will not, answer those type questions already because they know that it makes them look like a bible believing hick to the media and general public, although they know the truth, already they find ways to finesse their response to escape confrontation, controversy, and permanently being branded and even ejected from the public arena., how do you think they will start responding if it means destroying the Republican presidential candidate that they dearly support?

If you want to hear it happening the listen to Hugh Hewitt, who portrays himself as a devout Christian host, yet wrote the book defending Romney, called ‘A Mormon in the White House?’, listen to Michael Medved, call their show and try to point out something Mormon about Romney.

EXAMPLE 1:
“According to author and radio personality Hewitt, Mitt Romney-billionaire venture capitalist, consummate family man, gifted and media-savvy politician-would be unstoppable in the coming presidential race were it not for one niggling line on his resumé: he’s a Mormon. In this unashamedly partisan volume, Hewitt attempts to refute the claim that no Mormon could get elected President (along with any other claim that might be made against Romney) while analyzing the former Massachusetts governor’s biography and burnishing his conservative and leadership credentials. Hewitt is an agreeable, if inelegant, writer, wise enough to take detours (such as an edifying primer on Mormon history and thought) that stave off tedium. He spends far more time extolling Romney than excoriating his Republican and Democratic opponents. This is an efficient and effective exercise in political hagiography.”