Posted on 01/23/2012 8:53:06 AM PST by fishtank
Good article commenting on more junk science.
lol
Hey! Look, I know none of the equations, science, and evidence support atheistic evolution, but just throw in 1,000,000,000,000,000,000 years to any argument, and Time becomes the wild card in the Sophistical game.
More complex still is a blind man carrying a legless man across a street while reading an article about it in braille. Unless the legless man read it, or maybe they both do. Need more research on that.
Give 500 monkeys 2000 typewriters all of eternity, and they still wouldn’t come up with the babble of evolution.
Not only is evolution not science, it’s also not logical. I know there aren’t any, but I’d like to see a single species observed to have “evolved” from one species into another new one. There’s not a single one. Because it doesn’t exist.
Very interesting but I’m not convinced by the logic. I assume that, like the combination of a legless and blind man, the molecules in question have become more complex and have continued to perform their original functions using a different configuration.
If such a thing were possible, I think a blind man and legless man merging together would indeed be more complex and might benefit by virtue of 2 brains, 2 personalities. 4 ears, 4 arms, etc.
It was, after all, their analogy.
Well, if you’re into logic, then you know that evolution isn’t logical. So that can end that conversation right there.
—would indeed be more complex and might benefit by virtue of 2 brains, 2 personalities. 4 ears, 4 arms, etc.—
But would it have been better? I understand that half of all two brained entities end up in divorce.
We don't observe God creating living things out of nothing in a flash. He takes his time. It took 13.7 billion years to create us.
Hey decimon, thought you might like to see this! :-)
Please, please go away, creationists.
You are making we educated Christians look almost as stupid as liberals and Muslims.
If you insist on the earth only being around 4k years old, you may as well also decide that the earth is only one second old, and we’ve just been imprinted with our memories.
I have lots of questions about evolution, I also have logical questions about this article.
You mean two brained humans, lots of animals either pair for life or never pair.
If we use a married couple as the example you can add procreation and reduced expenses living together to the benefits. And following the divorce, one organism will probably end up better than before.
Well, the big difference between a married couple and a couple of animals is that the humans have human consciousness and are made in God’s image. They have free will, while the animals basically live off instinct.
It complicates things, as time has proven. ;)
Fair enough. But there is NO logic in the argument (theory) of evolution. Affirming the consequent means absolutely nothing, logically speaking.
Every Christian is a creationist, but not all creationists are “young earth” creationists. Intelligent design does not = youth earth creationism.
I have always thought that the Pterosaurs are proof of intelligent design. Here you have this creature with radically different design in limbs, joints and other attributes that just appears, bamb, on the scene perfectly adapted to fly. If you look at the mechanics of the wing and the body, the specialized finger bone, it is obvious that it was designed. I do believe in evolution but I don’t think it is the only force at work.
Exactly what I was thinking. Great album, btw.
I just realized that’s Chi Chi Rodriguez on the cover.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.