Far too broad a statement - "all miracles are facts". First, you have to define "miracle", then get agreement from the "eyewitnesses", then allow knowledge gained over time to prove - or disprove - the supposed "miracle".
Not true at all. A miracle is defined as a supernatural occurance. We do have agreement from eyewitness. Many eyewitness and no witnesses disputing them. That is evidence of proof in any court in the land. 2000 years have gone by and nobody has been able to disprove them yet. You merely beg the question by assuming miracles can't occur. A position which is supported by neither logic or reason.