Reading Skills indeed. You might want to re-read posts #16, 21, 24, 29, 44. It is QUITE CLEAR that ONLY Protestants were included in the slander. (Nice sleight of hand to try to say I was claiming ALL Protestants were attacked here, but that’s not what I said.) Please follow your own advice and practice the reading skills you are advising me to practice!!
I saw WAY more despicable insults hurled at both the author of the piece and other Protestants than at Catholics on the thread. If this is your idea of sweetness and light, well...enough said, I think.
Also post #217. But, hey, who’s counting? It’s all “sweetness and light” - right??/s
“You might want to re-read posts #16, 21, 24, 29, 44. It is QUITE CLEAR that ONLY Protestants were included in the slander.”
16. No slander or insult there.
21. He clearly speaks of Catholics who lack the intellectual capabilities to ever become a Catholic priest.
24. There is absolutely not one iota of slander against anyone in that note. The poster wrote, “Calvinism selectively cherrypicks verses to fit its theory while ignoring those that object to it.” I can’t believe that you really think you could find a jury of objective individuals of any faith to call that slander.
29. No slander there either. Not by the wildest stretch of imagination.
44. No slander or insult there either.
“Nice sleight of hand to try to say I was claiming ALL Protestants were attacked here, but that’s not what I said.”
Well, golly, it never occurred to me to think that any remark about any protestant at all was strictly forbidden. I assumed that you were being far more reasonable than that.
“I saw WAY more despicable insults hurled at both the author of the piece and other Protestants than at Catholics on the thread.”
Then you are biased beyond any hope of rationality. Good bye. I regret ever having posted to you, and won’t make that mistake again, memory permitting.