[RegulatorCountry]

Though Protestant commentaries often see no logical connection between St. Paul's words and regular ecclesiastical life, and thus deem this passage figurative, the connection is not figurative for those living within a traditional ecclesiology conditioned by the patristic witness.

Looks like you're having a hard time deciphering just what might constitute a legitimate "caucus" for your beliefs. If you post articles that don't compare or comment upon other beliefs outside the intended caucus, then the caucus designation will stick.

It's really not that complicated.

[knarf]

[robert14]

What Paul said in Romans made a lot of sense to me and was easy to understand. I have no idea what you are trying to say.

[Religion Moderator]

The article does not qualify for a caucus because it mentions the beliefs of non-members who therefore have an interest in speaking for themselves.

[CynicalBear]

>>Though Protestant commentaries often see no logical connection between St. Paul's words<<

What are the rules for a caucus thread again?