I’m already sealed.
>>Aren’t you being just a tad presumptuous? Unless you have a living faith, it is worthless in the eyes of God.
What requires God to save you just because you give some sort of intellectual assent to something you read in the Bible?
Eternal security is unbiblical.
Free-will Baptists reject the idea, so what makes your interpretation more accurate than theirs?
Here are just a few Evangelical sites that seem to disagree with your interpretation of the Bible on eternal security.
http://morechristlike.com/unbiblical-teachings/
http://morechristlike.com/are-errors-faults-and-mistakes-sin/
http://www.eternalsecurity.us/doctrinal_delusions_of_dave_hunt.htm
http://www.eternalsecurity.us/if_you_can_lose_your_salvation.htm
http://eternalsecurity.us/once_saved_always_saved%20a%20substitute%20for%20grace.htm
Is your reading of the Bible then a matter of taste?