Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: BenKenobi; CynicalBear; metmom; presently no screen name; boatbums; daniel1212

IOW, abortions BEFORE the 40 day cut-off were NOT BANNED. And therefore could be considered a form of contraception.?


602 posted on 01/06/2012 5:53:23 PM PST by smvoice (Better Buck up, Buttercup. The wailing and gnashing is for an eternity..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 598 | View Replies ]


To: smvoice

If they were all alive today they would all be excommunicating each other and the whole of the RCC would disintegrate. Infallibly of course.


603 posted on 01/06/2012 5:58:03 PM PST by CynicalBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 602 | View Replies ]

To: smvoice

Yes, that is because they didn’t know that conception was the point at which a child becomes a child.

They hadn’t even seen what conception was at that point. No one had demonstrated it. It’s not like you could take a petri dish out and do an in-vitro fertlization to demonstrate conclusively that conception was the decisive point.

The clear point is that after 40 days, abortion was banned. So clearly the Church did reject abortion during the period when they believed that the child was a child.


606 posted on 01/06/2012 6:04:56 PM PST by BenKenobi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 602 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson