And let me guess, that argument holds true until the next time you guys want to point to your catechism as infallible...
It would seem that whoever wrote your newer catechism deemed it infallible...And it seems your religion accepted it as infallible...
But of course your catechism, new or old is fallible...And what is so back slapping funny is that until today, you guys tried to defend that position of your catechism with some of the craziest excuses...
But hey, what's your pope say about this new declaration???
Infallible doctrine is defined by papal encyclical and doctrinal councils like Vatican I (and unlike Vatican II). Catechisms often contain infallible teaching but may also contain non-infallible teaching and even errors. The CCC has been revised several times in just a few years.
And what is so back slapping funny is that until today, you guys tried to defend that position of your catechism with some of the craziest excuses...
Genuine Catholic doctrine is considered offensive to the modern mind. Vatican II outwardly appeared to be a pathetic attempt at making the Church more agreeable in the eyes of the outside world. In fact, Vatican II was more likely an attack by hostile infiltrators aiming to subvert the Church mission. Mainline Protestant denominations have suffered similar attacks. Crazy excuses are necessary for anyone seeking to square the circle of Vatican II.