Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: LearnsFromMistakes
What wasn't understood at the time was the the blood from the mother did not pass to the child. Interesting point that, in this case, the truth of science didn't catch up to the bible until I don't know when.

Huh? Jesus did not have Mary's genes(and mitochondria)? Adam was not Mary's ancestor?
13 posted on 12/08/2011 8:43:56 AM PST by DarkSavant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: DarkSavant
Huh? Jesus did not have Mary's genes(and mitochondria)? Adam was not Mary's ancestor?

I specifically mentioned 'blood'. We call it a 'blood line', but that is just an old and accepted term. Yes, Jesus' was related to Adam/Mary thru the 'blood line'. But he didn't have 'their blood in his veins' - another old term we use that science has now provided answers for.

25 posted on 12/08/2011 9:04:40 AM PST by LearnsFromMistakes (Yes, I am happy to see you. But that IS a gun in my pocket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson