Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: impimp
It is in the original but remember he is into one hit wonder verses he is explicitly trying to put it as an absolute. But he next verse has peter/cephas(cephas is peter) above blessing paul at that time in the letter. His point is trying to split Peters authority.

Galatians 2:7 "On the contrary, they recognized that I had been entrusted with the task of preaching the gospel to the uncircumcised,[a] just as Peter had been to the circumcised.[b] 8 For God, who was at work in Peter as an apostle to the circumcised, was also at work in me as an apostle to the Gentiles. 9 James, Cephas[c] and John, those esteemed as pillars, gave me and Barnabas the right hand of fellowship when they recognized the grace given to me."

101 posted on 12/01/2011 8:13:08 PM PST by johngrace (1 John 4!- declared at every Sunday Mass,Divine Mercy and Rosary prayers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]


To: johngrace

OK - my bad. I see it in 2:8. I was checking Galatians 2:7. Regardless there is no splitting of Peter’s authority - the early church would attest to that.


108 posted on 12/01/2011 8:33:06 PM PST by impimp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson