Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: betty boop

The Pope has said that “there is much scientific proof in favor of evolution, which appears as a reality that we must see and which enriches our understanding of life and being as such.”.

“Proof” and “reality” - yeah - that is sure ambiguous. NOT!


375 posted on 12/09/2011 10:04:20 AM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 374 | View Replies ]


To: allmendream; schaef21; Alamo-Girl; xzins
Dear friend, when the Pope said that "there is much scientific proof in favor of evolution," he expressly did not say Darwinian evolution.

If the Holy Father had particularly wanted to endorse Darwin's theory, he would have done so. The fact remains he did not.

I believe what the Pope was saying is that there is scientific "proof" (at least abundant evidence) for biological evolution — even cosmic evolution for that matter.

But this is what we would expect in a divinely created Cosmos evolving in space and time according to the divine Logos of the Beginning, from Alpha to Omega.

Darwinism carries absolutely no brief for that idea, certainly. Rather, the very contrary is asserted: In a nutshell, Darwinian evolution is not purposeful; it is "random," "unguided," essentially "accidental" and "opportunistic"....

How could you expect the Holy Father to endorse such an idea?

379 posted on 12/09/2011 10:43:46 AM PST by betty boop (We are led to believe a lie when we see with, and not through, the eye. — William Blake)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 375 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson