Allmendream I have referred you in the past, and do so again today to two young earth creation scientists who have made correct and accurate predictions regarding creation science.
It is only useless to you because you refuse to read the works of:
Dr. Russell Humphreys PhD and
Dr Walt Brown PhD.
More specifically the former in the book ‘Starlight and Time’
and the latter in the book ‘In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood’
Good day sir!
Oh, if I read their works THEN it would be of use doing WHAT exactly? What useful applications discoveries or predictions have been made via presupposition of supernatural causation?
Did they propose that this supernatural causation was measurable, replicable, understandable and predictable?
If not then how can one make accurate predictions based upon an unpredictable causation?
Starlight and time is apologetics to try to get the absurdly small square peg of Creationist chronology into the immense round hole of the actual age of starlight.
Apologetics is not now and never will be science.
Science is of use.
Creationism is useless.