[caww]

When you define yourself not in terms of what you are, but in terms of what you are not, then all kinds of silly possibilities can be developed.

Is not that the same reasoning as when one believes what's 'not written' rather than adhere to what "is written".

[MarkBsnr]

When you define yourself not in terms of what you are, but in terms of what you are not, then all kinds of silly possibilities can be developed.

Is not that the same reasoning as when one believes what's 'not written' rather than adhere to what "is written

Not sure that I understand what you mean.