Well, thanks, you have made it clear that in all your requests to try to get someone to declare they ARE infallible - just so you can then mock them and deride their foolish pride - anyone who honestly admits in the human sense their fallible, mortal selves you proceed to conclude you have permission to declare anything they may say from then on is not worth reading. I believe your scheme has been exposed as duplicitous. In reality, even your highly esteemed "Church" has no assurance of infallibility other than what they declare for themselves and their minions happily bow to whatever myths, legends and alcohol-induced nightmares that get written down and stamped with an "Imprimatur". Jesus certainly never gave them such at least not more than any other Christian sensitive and open to the leading of the indwelling Holy Spirit of God who Jesus DID promise would lead us into ALL truth.
But thanks for showing your motives, I remain unconvinced of what you were probably aiming to prove. Perhaps one day your comments may prove trustworthy again.
It’s not at all duplicitous. If you can proclaim AND defend the Protestant Principle and be consistent in your argument, I’m fine with that debater, I welcome them.
If, however, you wish to infallibly declare the Church is fallible according to your fallible self, then yes, I will call you out on it.
BB, I am fine with simple faith, simply stated, I honor them.
But those who post this type of vile accusation against Christ’s Church can not do so without expecting Her to defend.
If you wish to defend a poor innocent poster, look elsewhere.