... who was invited to preach in a Catholic church. Not a very good thing all 'round. Not that I have any control over nor association with the Episcopal Church, I've got some historical reasons to have a little disdain for the established state church of colonial rule, one that persecuted people including my own, just as surely as the Catholic Church did in Europe.
You on the other hand are Catholic. What is your rationalization for this? Do you place your imprimatur of approval as well upon this gay Episcopal bishop, since he was invited to preach in a Catholic church?
my first post on this thread was a condemnation of the Catholic Church for allowing this.
the plague of child molesting priests is a judgement from God for the Church leaving it’s first love.
JP II scandalized the Church when he invited all the pagan religions of the world to Assisi to “pray” and he failed to preach Jesus Christ and Him crucified to them. in essence, he put Jesus on par with muslims, hindus, animalists, buddists, etc etc.
when the Pope no longer declares Jesus as the way, the truth and the life, the falling away predicted by the Scriptures is here and Jesus Christ is at the door to return to earth.
First of all, this Otis Charles creature is a protestant heretic. Inviting him to lead Vespers is inappropriate ... wrong ... inexcusable for that reason alone.
To make matters worse, he's a militant queer who divorced his wife, abandoned his children, and is openly and infamously living in perversion with another male homosexual pervert, in defiance of the Church's God-given teaching on the sanctity of marriage and the purpose of human sexuality. Even if he weren't a protestant heretic, inviting him to lead Vespers (or perform any other ministry on behalf of the Church) is a grave scandal. It is wrong ... inappropriate ... inexcusable to give any appearance of approval to his public embrace of depravity.