Replies

I think it is clear to everyone, maybe except the idiot kid of Ronald Reagan, that human embryonic stem cells have given us nothing and in fact adult stem cells are showing a wealth of promise. In 2001, Bush was asked to allow the research of only a set number of embryonic cell lines. Are we sure Newt was not talking about those at the time?

Has he been asked today how he thinks on the subject? Has anyone on this forum ever changed their mind faced with new information or experience?

The quadmire in Washington that involves the worst partisan politics that I can remember, cannot be solved by a Mitt Romney and surely not by reelecting the dumbest most incompetent president of our time. I think it will require real reform and fresh ideas. It will require tested leadership.

All of us have doubts on all the candidates. None of the candidates are perfect. Of the candidates, Newt strikes me as being the most capable of articulating our views on the wide variety of issues.

I learn from him, when he speaks. I think in time the American public on all sides will agree with a man who appears to be the most correct on the issues facing us today.

I welcome an open and honest debate between our leading candidates. I would love to see Mitt and Newt discuss their philosophies at length, and then the victor does the same with Obama, if he dare agree to debate.

I don’t think Cain is able. Backman is also a light weight. Perry, well, Perry is Perry and needs to better define who he is and what he can do, but I don’t feel confident he can lead us.

Of them all, I now prefer Newt. I’ve made this decision three weeks ago, and have no regrets thus far. I’m listening to the debates tonight with eagerness. His answers are fresh each time, and not a regurgitation of 9-9-9 or the tired rhetoric of Romeny.

In summary, I’m for Newt. I accept his faults, which in my mind are minor, and believe that he is the best person for the job of those out there running.