To: Quix
You can spam a thread all you like my FRiend, but that doesn't change the fact that the modern concept of the Rapture was unheard of prior to the 1830s. Its an invention of man, an incorrect interpretation of one or two scripture verses. An interpretation that is false and has caused enormous harm to the body of Christ.
To: Quix; Dr. Brian Kopp
WOW ! The WORD of G-d is Spam !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
shalom b'SHEM Yah'shua HaMashiach
154 posted on
11/14/2011 8:47:47 AM PST by
Uri’el-2012
(Psalm 119:174 I long for Your salvation, YHvH, Your law is my delight.)
To: Dr. Brian Kopp; smvoice; presently no screen name; GiovannaNicoletta; metmom
, but that doesn't change the fact that the modern concept of the Rapture was unheard of prior to the 1830s. Its an invention of man, an incorrect interpretation of one or two scripture verses. An interpretation that is false and has caused enormous harm to the body of Christ. We have DOCUMENTED
The falseness of such assertions many times on FR. Why RC's persist in believing and posting such inaccuracies is beyond me . . . unless it's perverse . . . cussedness.
Such interpretations have been documented very solidly back more than 800 years and somewhat solidly to the early church.
155 posted on
11/14/2011 8:53:47 AM PST by
Quix
(Times are a changin' INSURE you have believed in your heart & confessed Jesus as Lord Come NtheFlesh)
To: Dr. Brian Kopp
So,
if RC’s descend on a Proddy thread, it’s
“RIGHTEOUS SPAMMING” by the
Vatican-Ashteroth-Mary-Cult’s agents???
But if Proddys do, it’s intolerable?
LOL.
157 posted on
11/14/2011 8:55:14 AM PST by
Quix
(Times are a changin' INSURE you have believed in your heart & confessed Jesus as Lord Come NtheFlesh)
To: Dr. Brian Kopp; Quix
You can spam a thread all you like my FRiend, but that doesn't change the fact that the modern concept of the Rapture was unheard of prior to the 1830s. Its an invention of man, an incorrect interpretation of one or two scripture verses. An interpretation that is false and has caused enormous harm to the body of Christ. Kind of like how the assumption of Mary wasn't church doctrine until the 1900's......
For that matter, most of the doctrine about Mary didn't come til later. If something being realized later in time is an indicator of it's validity, there is none for most of the stuff about Mary.
173 posted on
11/14/2011 9:29:07 AM PST by
metmom
(For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
To: Dr. Brian Kopp; Quix
>> “but that doesn’t change the fact that the modern concept of the Rapture was unheard of prior to the 1830s. Its an invention of man, an incorrect interpretation of one or two scripture verses” <<
.
So you believe that the “first resurrection” will not happen?
255 posted on
11/14/2011 4:47:37 PM PST by
editor-surveyor
(No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson