If it can be proven that:
1, the incident reported actually occurred.
2, that the incident was reported before statutes of limitations.
3, that the Church had knowledge of the incident prior to it being reported.
Otherwise, no.
1, the incident reported actually occurred.
2, that the incident was reported before statutes of limitations.
3, that the Church had knowledge of the incident prior to it being reported.
Otherwise, no.
For the most part, this works for me. I'd change point #3 to add "...or the Church had knowledge of previous incidents committed by the same individual". Does that change work for you?