[dartuser]

Acts 8 clearly shows that the eunich was required to believe before he was baptized.

"If you believe ... you may ... "

That alone negates infant baptism.

[one Lord one faith one baptism]

absolutely not. when one understands what baptism is, they understand why the Church received the practice of baptizing infants from the Apostles.

we know from Church history when heresies arose, there was a big debate in the Church and sometimes a Church Council was called. now, if infant baptism was not recived from the Apostles as the Church Fathers tell us, tell me:

1. when did infant baptism start?
2. who started it?
3. what “true” Christians stood up to comdemn this unbiblical practice?

i look forward to your answers.