To: CynicalBear; metmom; Zionist Conspirator; smvoice; boatbums; caww
Why should doctrine need to concur with the so-called church "fathers" when, as pious and holy as they overall seem to be, they not always consistent with each other, and the claimed
unanimous consent of the fathers is a myth, and they also can be
invoked for supporting evangelical teachings, and some believed sexual relations even in marriage was necessarily
sin? Paul warned about
thinking of men above that which is written, (1 Corinthians 4:6) in the context of building the church, and this is often disobeyed, both in Roman Catholic as well as Protestant circles by judging Scripture by men, rather than judging all by it.
200 posted on
10/29/2011 5:48:13 PM PDT by
daniel1212
(Our sinful deeds condemn us, but Christ's death and resurrection gains salvation. Repent +Believe)
To: daniel1212
Since I am neither chr*stian, Protestant, nor a believer in sola scriptura, this post does not apply to me.
210 posted on
10/29/2011 7:22:33 PM PDT by
Zionist Conspirator
(Ki-hagoy vehamamlakhah 'asher lo'-ya`avdukh yove'du; vehagoyim charov yecheravu.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson