What’s so ironic? I believe some of what Calvin said but abhor some of what he said and did such as with Michael Servetus. I find some of the things the CC teaches to be scriptural but much of it is not. Why do you think we refer back to scripture “to see if these things are true”? It’s your church that has the “unanimous consent” idea. I pointed out that not all of the church fathers believed the same things as the CC does today. At the least the “unanimous consent” deal is a joke.
what’s ironic is anyone who denies the Real Presence in the Eucharist would not fellowship or worship with Tertullian, Origen or Clement and they would have considered such people heretics, outside the Faith.
today we have a much more “liberal” understanding of who is a Christian, with 30,000 denominations all claiming to be the “Church”. back in the second and third century, there was only the Universal Church.