Replies

The valid logic was explained earlier; but you wanted to frame the debate in your own way so that you could argue the matter. You attempted to work from a false foundation - did Tim say something? - when the point was not what was said, but what was inferred by his simple statement.

Perhaps you would like to read more about that tactic.

All coins have two sides, as do all statements. One does not have to say something to have their statement infer it.

Tim's a good man. He wanted to praise God, something which I believe should be done in prayer, between friends or from the pulpit - not in public. The selective praise leaves openings for valid criticism, as I pointed out. Tim would never say that God was against the Dolphins, because he's a good man and because that would be an incredibly stupid thing to say. (Are you listening?)

If God is omniscient, he knows what's in our hearts and minds. We don't have to go-a-praising every time we see a microphone or crowd.

Go Broncos!