Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: smvoice

Getting the basic facts before making an outlandish accusation is hardly a snipe hunt.

A simple courtesy would be not to make assumptions or accusations if one doesn’t know the facts - for whatever reason: lack of basic research or the need for more in depth knowledge of the subject.

That kind of posting policy would be worthy of respect.


826 posted on 10/28/2011 2:10:41 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 824 | View Replies ]


To: D-fendr; CynicalBear; metmom

It would be wonderful to be able to research the RCC FACTS. However, the RCC’s “FACTS” are FLUID. They don’t exist in an unerring, unchanging, eternal way. The RCC “facts” consist of teaching the “faithful” to be endlessly fascinated by ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. Good work when you can get it, I guess. In this life anyway. Worthless when measured against God’s Book of FACTS. So continue to tell me to research the RCC facts for more information before I give my opinion on the subject. I will be more likely to shoot a jackelope than come away with a solid RCC “fact.”


849 posted on 10/28/2011 7:03:25 PM PDT by smvoice (The Cross was NOT God's Plan B.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 826 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson