Hmmmm...I posted three passages of wcripture, and then was told that, although I let the scripture stand on its own and did not offer any meaning, I had not followed the correct rules of “parabolic interpretation”
That leads me to conclude that no matter how clear the meaning Christ;s words were, it didn’t fit the scriptural rules of the YOPIOS crowd. How can they be trusted?
From what I saw you posted one verse then let that verse stand on it’s own with only the one interpretation by the RCC. No other scripture to support that meaning. That’s a huge problem with the RCC. Others show other scripture that refutes the RCC meaning of that scripture and you deny that scripture refutes the RCC interpretation. If a belief about a portion of scripture is to be considered correct it must be supported by other scripture. Typically the rule is at least three other sources within scripture to support the meaning.