I fail to understand how the Episcopal Church comes into play here. Did you not reference the story of the Eunuch to prove your point that someone needs instruction or explanation? If so, the RCC is not just explaining, it’s injecting meaning and adding to meaning. That’s not Sola Scriptura.
Correct.
Did you not reference the story of the Eunuch to prove your point that someone needs instruction or explanation?
No, I did not.
The argument would be an attempt to prove. I did not make an argument. I DID say how one of mine would start.
But my principle point was that assumption corrupts discourse. I made the point, and you gave an example.