Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins
Okay. But at this point in the discussion, the question is whether illegal immigrants, who know perfectly well that they are engaged in an illegal action, qualify as peaceful, lawful soujorners or as criminal invaders. I presume that Elimelech did not start out his soujorn by violating the laws of Moab, so how does the way he was treated affect the discussion here?

Shalom

155 posted on 10/24/2011 8:25:40 AM PDT by Buggman (returnofbenjamin.wordpress.com - Baruch haBa b'Shem ADONAI!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]


To: Buggman

A different time in history is important, but that doesn’t change the issue of openness versus closedness. In a time of nation-states and borders and tight control, there are laws about the movement of one people into the territory of another.

Moreover, Ruth had marriage rights in a land not her own by virtue of her marriage to Naomi’s son. Those rights were honored even though she were a foreigner.


156 posted on 10/24/2011 8:34:54 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True Supporters of our Troops PRAY for their VICTORY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson