What about REVERTS?
;-)))
The Bible has some choice words to say about people who stir up disputes for their own amusement (or in the author’s case, for money). Every Christian, whether baptized at birth or converted in old age, has the same obligation to holiness of life and evangelization of the world ... and each one has the array of opportunities God provides him.
And anyone who thinks, “Oh, marvelous me! I’m better than (those other folks) because I (fill in self-praise) ...” is missing the boat.
They probably do; adult converts to any faith think about the tenets of that faith than those born in it. “Fish aren’t aware of water.” That holds for those who convert to Protestantism from Catholicism as well.
I am a cradle Catholic and I agree with the pope on this. I believe in the history and that Rome has the right grasp on it and I believe in the divinity of Jesus, but I struggle with the hocus pocus part of Catholicism... or any religion for that matter. Jesus was a once in a planet individual, but I don’t buy that modern man with “reverend” in front of their name talks to God and performs magic. The converts and born agains are definitely more faithful in those regards.
"Sudden conversion might be good for morale and motivation, but the emotional instability and lack of knowledge of the sudden convert endangers the continuity of a group," Alan F. Segal wrote in his study, "Paul the Convert: The Apostolate and Apostasy of Saul the Pharisee." "Building a stable community necessarily involves a strong educational program. Even persons who themselves were sudden converts often attempt to socialize their children via gradual conversion processes."
That is the biggest issue I have with newly converted people. The enthusiasm and desire to learn is tremendous...and very infectious. But sometimes I find that the depth of understanding is lacking. Fortunately, the majority are humble enough to listen. Also, fortunately, the problem is usually self-correcting.
I’m a cradle Catholic.
When I got to college, I asked myself “Were you just lucky enough to have been born into the right faith?”
After looking into the Baptists, the answer was “Yes”
Most “cradle Catholics” were taught “what” not “why”.
Converts and “reverts” are more likely to have studied and learned the history and the Biblical basis for the teachings.
They are more aware that the Council of Trent resolved the majority of Luther’s concerns, only 45 years later.
They are also aware that Luther didn’t share many of the beliefs and assertions of today’s Protestants.
But are Catholics "by birth"—or any believers raised in a religious tradition—indeed less-convincing witnesses, or less motivated, than are converts? Do they have a greater responsibility to live up to the tenets of the faith since they have known Christ from their earliest years? And are they a bigger disappointment to the Mother Church—and the world—when they come up short?...
....Yet conversion is a double-edged sword. The zeal of newfound faith can be little more than a superficial emotionalism that makes for great theater—especially in today's reality-television culture—but does not endure. Or zeal can tip into fanaticism, as we have seen all too often, undermining a faith (and its public image) by overreaching....
....Whether converts do that better than "cradle Catholics"—or whether, as is often the case, that is a distinction without a difference—both categories of believers are bound by the same vocation. Both are as responsible for the success or failure of the church's witness.
"Having read [Francis Beckwith]’s book, I am appalled at the blatant misrepresentation of both the Reformed teaching as well the teaching of Roman Catholicism. His lack of knowledge on historical issues is forgivable, given his ignorance, but to misrepresent and caricature the Reformed faith and to misrepresent the salvation teachings of Rome is simply irresponsible and dishonest..."There are many, many "former-Protestant-turns-Catholic" conversion stories posted on FR that bear these same marks. The majority focus on converts with a poor command of their former faith, who swam the Tiber in their early to mid twenties. Some bear witness to converts already being swayed by "every wind of doctrine" before they converted. Most of these conversion stories fall into a common theme - "fringe member (or non-member) starts out illiterate and ignorant of his/her own confession, then gains publicity and fame on EWTN by making a loud, trumpeted conversion to Catholicism."
-- from the internet article Why Scripture and the Facts of History Compel Me, a Former Roman Catholic, to Remain a Committed Evangelical Protestant
Take, for example, the story of James Akin. A convert in his mid-twenties, he was actually a whole lot of things before he became Catholic in his mid-twenties, but one Catholic FReeper hawked James as being a "former Presbyterian".
Another favorite is the story of Rodney Beason, supposedly a former Calvinist, and re-solicited as "a powerful conversion story". A first year college student, he claimed to have "a library full of Calvin, Luther, Warfield, Hodge, Murray, Owen, Machen, etc" and to have "helped plant a local Orthodox Presbyterian Church". A little digging on Google, however, and his conversion story was called into question. In the end, Rodney Beason himself signed up to FR just to provide all with the rest of his "powerful conversion story". Having abandoned the Catholic Church within two years of his 2002 conversion, he wishes Catholics would stop (re)publishing his story.
And then there's the tale of Rob Evans. I know what you're thinking - "who is Rob Evans?" Evans' previous claim to fame was a direct-to-VHS children's series titled The Donut Repair Club, marketed to children in Evangelical households in the early 1990s. When he wasn't entertaining children, Rob was a Presbyterian Pentecostal Baptist multiple-church-splitting spiritual wanderer, who was kicked out of at least one congregation before his conversion to Catholicism. His conversion nicely coincided with EWTN acquiring broadcasting rights to his out-of-production Donut Repair Club.
Finally, there's Fr. Erik J. Richtsteig, billed as a "former Mormon" The problem is, Fr. Richtsteig stopped being Mormon by the time he was just eight years old, meaning he had never held office, never been on a mission, never been through a Temple ceremony. His "Mormon" experience was limited to Sunday attendance (without his mother) "sporadically".
I wonder how many of these Catholic converts actually attended churches that proclaimed the whole council of God? A question I would ask is how many Catholic converts previously went to churches with strong systematic confessions of faith, like the Westminster Confession, and how often were they taught the confession, like in a Sunday School class, and how well did their minister cover all the doctrines in the confession of faith? I would expect some rather weak answers.
-- from the thread Systematic Theology and Catholic Converts
All true converts regret their past errors, wish they had been raised Catholic, and seek to provide a Catholic upbringing to their children.
As a revert, I have learned much from converts about things most cradle Catholics take for granted.
But, from cradle Catholics I have learned about steadfastness and simple holiness.
I am grateful to know both.
Converts have to be intellectuals. And if you aren't one, they'll try to make you into one.