[MarkBsnr]

It never ceases to amaze me to watch the comments of those who try to espouse a view without facts. Jesus ascension was somewhere around 33AD right? Now you say “not even written down until a generation after the ascension of Jesus”. Now let’s look at the facts.

Facts? What facts? Next, you'll be providing us with digital photographs of the teenage Jesus and Joseph of Arimathea drinking out of the Holy Grail and eating fish and chips from a newspaper in Bath, England. Where did you get these facts from?

Would you please point out which of those was written “a generation” after Jesus ascension? If you can’t, do you honestly think that those letters were not used as scripture and teaching tools prior to your RCC telling them too? The arrogance of RCC is beyond astounding.

We are not arrogant enough to present unattributed copy off the Interwebs as 'facts'.

If you wish to discuss dates of Scripture, at least pretend to be objective.

[CynicalBear]

Yeah, I didn’t think you would be able to come up with provable or Biblical facts to disprove when those letters were actually written. I post provable fact and you come back with personal attacks? Is your theology that weak?