Replies

Here's the difference, I did not ever say the Christian Thinktank is an authority only that they gave plausible explanations for the "discrepancies" you seem to believe are in the Bible. That you do not accept their conclusions, only proves you must have an agenda in holding to your false claim that the Bible has errors. You often say that the Church "harmonized" the Scriptures, implying that somebody "monkeyed" with the actual writings. If that was true, then how do YOU explain the different titles above the head of Jesus? How do you explain the different narratives of the morning of the resurrection? Why didn't they "correct" the errors? I have no problem with trusting the infallible word of God, nor do I see a need for an infallible teaching authority to convince me of such.

Here's the difference, I did not ever say the Christian Thinktank is an authority only that they gave plausible explanations for the "discrepancies" you seem to believe are in the Bible.

Here's the problem with that statement. They admitted that they didn't have any.

That you do not accept their conclusions, only proves you must have an agenda in holding to your false claim that the Bible has errors.

They don't have conclusions - they have possibilities and speculations. Did you not read my quoting their conclusions? If they cannot explain it and you can find nobody who can, why do you call my posts (not beliefs) false?

You often say that the Church "harmonized" the Scriptures, implying that somebody "monkeyed" with the actual writings.

I never said 'monkey'.

If that was true, then how do YOU explain the different titles above the head of Jesus?

Ladies first.

Why didn't they "correct" the errors? I have no problem with trusting the infallible word of God, nor do I see a need for an infallible teaching authority to convince me of such.

You consist of an individual interpreting Scripture. How do you call four different accounts, all in contradiction of the other infallible? Do you hold four different views of any event in your real life and consider yourself to have infallible interpretation of it?