Paul is not in the Gospels...You can not see Paul in the Gospels...
Wow, just wow. No Jesus, just Paul. It is what we keep saying you guys do, and you guys keep denying it.
Did you skip over the verse???
And the all important "In the day when God shall judge the secrets of men by Jesus Christ according to MY GOSPEL". (Paul's gospel) Rom. 2:16.
Where do you think Paul got this information from??? He made it up???
Do you have any idea why Paul calls it his Gospel??? It's because Jesus revealed that Gospel to Paul (and not the others, not even Peter) to give to us...
My point exactly. Thank you for repeating it.
Wow, just wow. No Jesus, just Paul. It is what we keep saying you guys do, and you guys keep denying it.
Did you skip over the verse??? And the all important "In the day when God shall judge the secrets of men by Jesus Christ according to MY GOSPEL". (Paul's gospel) Rom. 2:16.
You guys interpret this as open season on creating your own doctrines based on your own interpretations of Paul (usually wrong) and ignoring the words of Christ, or worse, contradicting them. You ask if I skipped over a single verse. I do not. I understand that Paul preached Christ. It is you guys who do not. You guys think that with this snippet, that Paul is the successor of Christ, supplanting Him as the Ultimate source of revelation and taking snippets out of context to create ever increasing and ever more novel doctrines.
Do you have any idea why Paul calls it his Gospel??? It's because Jesus revealed that Gospel to Paul (and not the others, not even Peter) to give to us...
Just when I think that you have posted the most boneachingly wrong interpretation of Scripture, up comes an even better example. I should try to get you a job travelling from parish to parish so that we can tell the faithful that either you believe in Christ or else here is a good example.