Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Iscool
The charge was that I was wrong to say that "co-" meant "with". It was expressed in pretty strong language. The counter-assertion was that "co-" only and aways means "equal".

Is was that charge and assertion against which I was defending.

Your side ludicrously complains that an answer to one of your objections fails because it doesn't answer all your other objections.

1,948 posted on 09/08/2011 8:42:34 AM PDT by Mad Dawg (In my Father's trailer park are many double-wides. (apologies to Iscool))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1926 | View Replies ]


To: Mad Dawg
Your side ludicrously complains that an answer to one of your objections fails because it doesn't answer all your other objections.

I don't always agree with 'my side' and they don't always agree with me...I am not looking for the exception to prove that always does not mean always....

The point is that your magisterium knows exactly what co means 95% of the time and they use it anyway instead of correcting it with the actual Latin translationj...

And of course let us not forget that group of Catholics, what is it, about 4 million strong, who have a permanent petition with the Vatican to include Mary into the Trinity making it a Quadrinity...

2,008 posted on 09/08/2011 1:00:02 PM PDT by Iscool (You mess with me, you mess with the WHOLE trailerpark...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1948 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson