Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: smvoice
I thought that once a Catholic always a Catholic. If Hitler was baptized into the Catholic Church, rather he later renounced it or not, the Catholic Church still considered him a member. You’re not denying this most important point of Hotel Catholicfornia, are you? I know, I know, people can be excommunicated. Was he excommunicated?

I'm not positive here and God knows I'm not defending the RCC's general practices, but I do seem to remember something about Hitler being excommunicated. I may be wrong about that, but that uncertainty is what kept me from bringing this point up in my post.

1,103 posted on 09/06/2011 9:42:18 AM PDT by Avalon Hussar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1099 | View Replies ]


To: Avalon Hussar

I understand exactly what you are saying. My point is that the RCC seems to have it both ways. On the one hand, the RCC can claim that baptism into the Church is binding. On the other hand, baptism into the Church is not binding, if the Church decides a person, for whatever reason, is no longer worthy of being Catholic. So which is it? I’m curious.


1,110 posted on 09/06/2011 10:04:21 AM PDT by smvoice (The Cross was NOT God's Plan B.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1103 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson