“They embrace homosexuality and other sinful things but continue to operate as if they are a church.”
There are liberal African Anglican priests in Zimbabwe that embrace the homosexualist agenda? Because being a homosexualist in Zimbabwe is a little different than being gay in England. Everything I’ve ever heard about it says that the Anglicans in Africa are not homosexualized at all, in fact I got the impression of the opposite. I have heard that Anglicans in Africa actually have more success in some instances than Catholics because in some places they don’t trust non-married missionaries as they might be gay.
I could see priests/pastors of any group being against some of the brutal ways homosexualists and suspected homosexualists are treated in some cases.
Freegards
I was trying to convey that any Anglican diocese that is under the Archbishop of Canterbury has to accept the more liberal position. That being said, the conservative, orthodox ANglican communion in America has placed itself under the guidance of the African prelate because they are, as you say, more orthodox.