There’s one thing they’re ignoring here .... being homosexual and committing acts of homosexuality are two different things.
Now, if this priest committed such acts, he’s guilty. If not, then he set the example for gays to follow ... celibacy.
Just to further clarify my first comment...
Yes, this article acknowledges gay, celibate priests. My point was that the gay community, while seeking to honor Fr. Judge, are at the same time ignoring the message he (and others like him) lived right in front of them. Even if he was gay, he didn’t (as far as I know) act on it. That’s the model they should be following.