The dichotomy isn't false. It merely represents two extremes on a continuum.
If you are expressing a preference for tiny shorts and cut-off tank tops ...
I am expressing no such preference. This thread isn't about my preferences in dress. It is about the preferences of some women and their rights to indulge those preferences, even over the objections of others.
We do understand that a great many males like to look at women dressed in few or no clothes ...
I'm not sure who "we" is, but your observation is true, if patently obvious and not particularly germane.
Presenting two extremes - or any two points - as if they are the only points - “this” or “that,” leaving out everything else - is the definition of “false dichotomy.”
Nobody has challenged anyone’s “right” to wear what they choose. The discussion was about the moral (and taste) implications of various types of dress.
The rules of Saudi Arabia or Afghanistan are “not germane” to the issue of suggestions for appropriate dress for Christian women, although, for some reason, you wish to claim they are.