Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Christian Philosopher William Lane Craig Is Ready to Debate, but Finds Few Challengers
Fox News ^ | 08/19/2011 | Lauren Green

Posted on 08/21/2011 7:55:10 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

American Evangelical theologian William Lane Craig is ready to debate the rationality of faith during his U.K tour this fall, but it appears that some atheist philosophers are running shy of the challenge.

This month president of the British Humanist Association, Polly Toynbee, pulled out of an agreed debate at London’s Westminster Central Hall in October, saying she “hadn’t realized the nature of Mr. Lane Craig’s debating style.”

Lane Craig, who is a professor of philosophy at Talbot School of Theology in La Mirada, Calif., and author of 30 books and hundreds of scholarly articles, is no stranger to the art of debate and has taken on some of the great orators, such as famous atheists Christopher Hitchens and Sam Harris. Harris once described Craig as “the one Christian apologist who has put the fear of God into many of my fellow atheists”.

Responding to Toynbee’s cancellation, Lane Craig commented: "These folks (atheists) can be very brave when they are alone at the podium and there's no one there to challenge them. But one of the great things about these debates is that, it allows both sides to be heard on a level playing field, and for the students in the audience to make up their own minds about where they think the truth lies."

But David Silverman, president of the American Atheists, believes the reason behind the cancellation is much simpler.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Apologetics; Current Events; Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS: apologetics; atheism; dawkins; debate; toynbee; williamlanecraig
Richard Dawkins explains why he refuses to debate Dr. Craig :

"I have no intention of assisting Craig in his relentless drive for self-promotion."

1 posted on 08/21/2011 7:55:18 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

This from a master of self promotion. Dr. Craig promotes Christ, not himself.


2 posted on 08/21/2011 8:02:24 PM PDT by Louis Foxwell (O assumes the trappings of the presidency, not its mantle. He is not presidential.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

How do you know that?


3 posted on 08/21/2011 8:22:45 PM PDT by Richard from IL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Richard from IL

How do you know that?


Because we’re talking about Dawkins. Dawkins pretends to be a know-it-all so debating someone as talented as Craig would conflict with that.

Dawkins cannot even show me how to make a stick of butter out of nothing. None of the atheist could.


4 posted on 08/21/2011 9:11:45 PM PDT by boycott (CAL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Bookmarks


5 posted on 08/21/2011 9:48:56 PM PDT by GOP Poet (Obama is an OLYMPIC failure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I filled the margins with comments, reading Dawkins’ Blind Watchmaker. My 15 year old could hit his arguments out of the ballpark.


6 posted on 08/21/2011 10:08:20 PM PDT by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Richard from IL; SeekAndFind

Watch or listen to him debate! I’m a Catholic and have the utmost respect for his knowledge and debating skills. No wonder they’re all running scared.


7 posted on 08/21/2011 11:54:28 PM PDT by bronxville (Sarah will be the first American female president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Richard from IL

Is God Necessary for Morality? (Kagan vs Craig) 3/10
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sO1d2cX99bI&NR=1


8 posted on 08/22/2011 12:01:11 AM PDT by bronxville (Sarah will be the first American female president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bronxville

I watched pat 4 and 5 and it seemed obvious to me that Craig had Kagan squirming in his seat. I’m not surprised since once you accept “objectivity” as a valid frame of reference you’ve lost before you’ve even begun, especially by a skilled debater as Craig. If I were an atheist, I would attack the very premise of objectivity and deny my opponent his foundation, declaring instead that the distinction between the subjective and the objective is an unproven assumption and that all knowledge, whether it be the moral or the material, is necessarily subjective. It is a difficult road to take, but it is the only road that will bring the atheist a victory.


9 posted on 08/22/2011 1:29:05 AM PDT by csense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Richard from IL

I made several assertions in my post. Of which do you require clarification?


10 posted on 08/22/2011 5:01:12 AM PDT by Louis Foxwell (O assumes the trappings of the presidency, not its mantle. He is not presidential.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: csense

Absolutely correct. The atheist cannot claim any sort of objectivity since for him all truth is based on his own personal perception. Arguing from pure subjectivity is, however, fraught with the difficulty of making one’s opinions of more merit than those of a carrot. Only in a system based on absolute truth can any conversation be had. The rest is folderol.


11 posted on 08/22/2011 5:05:43 AM PDT by Louis Foxwell (O assumes the trappings of the presidency, not its mantle. He is not presidential.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell
...than those of a carrot.

LOL...

12 posted on 08/22/2011 5:12:38 AM PDT by csense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

I’m embarrased to say I’m not very familiar with Professor Craig. I like what I see though. I’ll have to pick up one of his books and delve a little deeper.


13 posted on 08/22/2011 5:23:25 AM PDT by csense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

Sorry, I misread your post to be a criticism of Dr. Craig. I thought you were stating that Dr. Craig promoted himself and not Christ. You were asserting the opposite. I know Dr. Craig and have a high opinion of him.


14 posted on 08/22/2011 6:08:56 AM PDT by Richard from IL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: csense; SeekAndFind

I just grabbed that one from youtube without giving it much thought - there are better ones at myspace and here (which is where I started to hear about him)...you’ll not only find Dr Craig but also Dr. Kreeft, D’Sousa etc., for free:
http://catholicaudio.blogspot.com/search/label/Atheism

Enjoy. :)


15 posted on 08/22/2011 7:55:38 AM PDT by bronxville (Sarah will be the first American female president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson