Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: FromTheSidelines; Elsie; ejonesie22; Godzilla; greyfoxx39; MHGinTN; Tennessee Nana; svcw

Hey, I’ve been here 10 years, you less than a month. And you are the one in need of schooling.

Why don’t you head back to DU where you belong. Or better yet, start a vanity thread about your views to dissolve the legal entity of marriage. That would be fun.

You have shown no logic, no morality and therefore the joke is on you.

If you are so thin-skinned as to be offended by ‘noob’ then the Religion Forum isn’t for you at all.

Post #25 and #26 for starters. Doing away with government sanctioned marriage is doing away with marriage. But I don’t expect much from lib trolls trying to pretend to be conservative.

LOL. You are not off to a good start here. I will bet money I will be here long after you get the zot.

Hey, Inmans, some fresh meat on the Plygy threads.


36 posted on 07/30/2011 8:28:03 PM PDT by reaganaut ( "I once was lost, but now am found; was blind but now I see")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: reaganaut; Elsie; ejonesie22; Godzilla; greyfoxx39; MHGinTN; Tennessee Nana; svcw; ...
First off, why the "call out" to a crew? Is it to drum-up support for your error?

Why don’t you head back to DU where you belong.

Because I'm not a liberal or Democrat. I'm a conservative. Apparently one that can read as well...

Or better yet, start a vanity thread about your views to dissolve the legal entity of marriage. That would be fun.

Because that's not what I've ever advocated here. It's what you want to believe I wrote, but nowhere near the truth.

You have shown no logic, no morality and therefore the joke is on you.

Really? Can you point out where? You came in here, busting my chops, and added nothing to the argument. Did not address my comments at all in terms of logic or morality, just your own ignorance and example of lack of reading comprehension.

So, how about doing the conservative thing and showing me where my logic is in error?

If you are so thin-skinned as to be offended by ‘noob’ then the Religion Forum isn’t for you at all.

It's not the term "n00b" that's the problem - I was called that much earlier here at FR. It's that you said it in a clearly mocking, condescending manner. It wasn't said in the love of Christ now, was it? And isn't that what the Religion forum is about?

Doing away with government sanctioned marriage is doing away with marriage.

Really? Explain that. How is it we need a State to recognize a religious ceremony? How is my commitment to another - in front of fellow brothers and sisters in Christ and the Lord God Himself - only valid if the Government sanctions it?

I'd be VERY curious to see what you say about that...

LOL. You are not off to a good start here. I will bet money I will be here long after you get the zot.

I'll do you one better - I've pinged the Religion Moderator on this post as well. If he can find that I've called for elimination of marriage - and not just elimination of State-recognition of marriage - I'll ask that he immediately "zot" me.

Failing that, if I'm still here in a day, I think the Christian thing for you to do would be to apologize, and consider how you behave in front of your fellow brothers and sisters in Christ.

Lastly, it is 100% Biblical to confront and correct a brother in Christ when they are going astray in there walk with Christ, and attacking and condemning others without cause.

38 posted on 07/30/2011 8:46:55 PM PDT by FromTheSidelines ("everything that deceives, also enchants" - Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson