We are discussing his post as written and posted here, you have been mischaracterizing it in my opinion.
It was a brilliant post, and raised a very important argument, and a is great history of how the situation got to where it is now.
No one has challenged this portion of it yet. “At this point, The majority of ordained priests from the 1st world are gay. Simple as that, and this has been true for probably 50+ years and the Church has been well aware of it, and seen it as a win-win of sorts.”
Perhaps you think “we” are discussing his post. “We” no longer are.