Why do some Christians feel it is insulting and blasphemous to think we “came from monkeys” but they think it is OK to believe we came from dust?
What is dust?
House dust is from dust mite dung.
“Humus” is nutrient rich soil, formed from decayed animal or vegetable matter.
Why is it alright, and not at all insulting, to think that God made Adam, literally, from DECAYED animals, but somehow blasphemous to think that God made Adam from a long process of evolution?
Either way, the point is that humans were made from the biological material of other living things -— even for the most Fundamental Creationists out there!
How do you suggest God explain DNA and microscopic cells and other complicated subjects to the illiterate masses thousands of years ago, when Genesis was written?
This entire argument is absurd.
God does have a sense of humor, and He is, no doubt, laughing at those of us who waste so much time on this non-issue.
Again, the radicals on both sides are wrong.
You can be a true Christian and still believe that Evolution was part of God's plan.
So if you can't believe Genesis 1-11 is true, if you can't believe that the Ten Commandments are true, if you can't believe our LORD's ancestry is true, if you say that Peter lied about the Flood, if you say that Jesus Christ lied concerning origins and the flood, if you claim that death preceded sin and thus reject the doctrines of Redemption and Grace and therefore the Gospel...
How exactly can you claim that an Evolutionist can be a "true Christian"?/p>