The Church has always considered Peter to be the first bishop of Rome and therefore the first pope. There is ample histories, references and evidence and tradition to do so, including the information in this article. Peter, not Paul nor anyone else.
Whether those outside the Church accept this is irrelevant and meaningless. That they do not accept the Church’s authority and teaching in any regard only makes it more so.
If they follow another church, let them worry about its own history and teaching - which, if past experience is a guide - they will avoid discussing at all cost.
Yep, but in a debate like this, I will not concede.
When one concedes or even grows tired of continuing the defense, it is used against the Church.
I do not care if one chooses to ignore or reject the clear teachings and history of Christ’s church.
I do care if someone not well versed in the truth should be led astray by misinformation and calumny against Truth.