Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Quix

Well, two comments then:

The Original Post mentions none of those three things, but adduces the relevant verse of Ps 69 as dispositive.

Therefore it seems to me that the whole method is indistinguishable from a projective technique. Those who think the “perpetual virginity” of Mary is not true will find proofs here and elsewhere. Those who think it is true will do ditto.

I’m not saying it IS a projective technique. I’m just saying I don’t see what one can point to to show it isn’t.

“You know my methods, Watson.” ;-)


426 posted on 06/16/2011 8:45:56 AM PDT by Mad Dawg (Oh Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 419 | View Replies ]


To: Mad Dawg

LOL.

I know. Have seen that so much.


428 posted on 06/16/2011 8:51:12 AM PDT by Quix (Times are a changin' INSURE you have believed in your heart & confessed Jesus as Lord Come NtheFlesh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 426 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson